Difference between revisions of "The Limitations of Qualifying Tube Shapes using Bender Data"

From ATTWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Visually Demonstrate the Problem of Qualifying with Angles)
(The Best Data for Qualification)
 
(47 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
== The Limitations of Bender Data for Qualifying Tube Shapes ==
+
== ENVELOPES Qualifying Tube Shapes Are Much Better Than Bender Data Deviations Qualifying Tubes ==
  
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
The tube fabrication industry rarely uses bender data to qualify part shapes because doing that '''requires the use of angles''' in the qualification.<br><br>
+
The tube fabrication industry is rapidly abandoning the use of bender data deviations to qualify part shapes for a very good reason.<br><br>
There is the major problem with using angles for qualification of tube shapes: '''Properly qualifying tube shapes with the angules in the bend data is a process that is always dependent on the magnitude of the lengths between bends.'''<br><br>
+
The problem with using bender data deviations for the qualification of a part shape is that it does not help you know if a part is inside or outside of 3D envelopes (or GD&T profiles) for each straight section in a tube shape without additional polar to linear calculations. Spatial envelopes represent the specific path in 3D space where the tube must be inside of in order to not cause a collision or rub itself to failure from vibration.<br><br>
 +
In VTube-LASER, this allowed space is called the ENVELOPE as defined by the TANGENT points along each straight in the defined tube (see the image on the right).  (Tangent points are where the straights meet the bends.)<br><br>
 +
The ENVELOPE always includes a tolerance of deviation allowed. Think of the deviation as a spherical radius true position from the MASTER centerline.
 +
</td>
 +
<td width=400>
 +
[[image:exhaust_envelope_tolerance.png|400px]]<br>
 +
The above image is an example of an exhaust pipe with a blue band around the straight section.  This blue band is the envelope tolerance.<br>  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
Line 54: Line 60:
  
 
====Illustration of the Limitation====
 
====Illustration of the Limitation====
Look at the bender data on the right. The two sets are not the same because I've made the MEASURED rotations to be exactly one degree off of the nominal or MASTER data.<br><br>
+
Look at the bender data on the right. The two sets are not the same because I've made the MEASURED rotations to be exactly one degree away from MASTER data rotations.<br><br>
Try to answer this question: ''Given a tolerance envelope of 0.1"'', does this part qualify or not?<br><br>
+
Try to answer this question: ''Given a tangent point envelope tolerance envelope of 0.100"'', does this part qualify or not?<br><br>
 +
This is the problem: There is no way to guess if this part is actually inside its allowed envelope in 3D space without performing some moderately complex trig calculations.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
Line 70: Line 77:
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
Unless you can perform 3D trigonometry mentally on-the-fly, the answer to the question above isn't obvious. Even if we guess the answer, we can not accurately guess at what tolerance envelope value the part would be considered acceptable.<br><br>
+
So, unless you can perform 3D trigonometry on-the-fly, the answer to the question above isn't obvious. Even if we make a guess, we can't accurately guess at what tolerance envelope value the part would be considered acceptable.<br><br>
 
It's easy to visually demonstrate the limitation of using bender data to tell us if a part shape falls within the tolerance envelope.<br><br>
 
It's easy to visually demonstrate the limitation of using bender data to tell us if a part shape falls within the tolerance envelope.<br><br>
Compare the two similar parts and their alignments. The image on the right is from the alignment of the two tubes from the LRA data shown in the report above. The white tube is the MASTER. The pink tube is the measured. The blue transparent cylinders that surround the tube are the TOLERANCE ENVELOPES. The tube shape must be within each straight's tolerance envelope to be considered a good shape - or a shape that qualifies.<br><br>
 
This first part has 4 inch straights for every straight. (See the LRA data above.)<br><br>
 
All the centerlines fall within within the tolerance envelope. The "T1 dev" column values are TANGENT 1 DEVIATIONS, and the "T2 dev" column values are TANGENT 2 DEVIATIONS.<br><br>
 
The tangent points are where the straights meet the bend arcs along the centerline.
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width=300>
 
<td width=300>
[[image:VTL image 4 inch straights.png|500px]]<br><br>
 
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
  
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
This second alignment image shows the part with IDENTICAL ANGLES - but the two middle straights are lengthened to 10 inches between bends.<br><br>
+
'''INSIDE THE ENVELOPES: QUALIFIES'''<br><br>
You can see red cells in the Tangent point/Midpoint grid, and yellow tolerance envelopes where the pink is breaking through.<br><br>
+
Compare the two aligned parts on the image. The white tube is the MASTER. The pink tube is the MEASURED ALIGNED. The blue transparent cylinders that surround the tube are the TOLERANCE ENVELOPES. The tube shape must be within each straight's tolerance envelope to be considered a good shape - or a shape that qualifies.<br><br>
The part is no longer within tolerance - even though all the angle deviations are identical between the two parts.<br><br>
+
This first part has 4 inch straights for every straight. (See the LRA data above.)<br><br>
 
+
All the centerlines fall within within the tolerance envelope as defined by the Tangent Grid. The "T1 dev" column values are TANGENT 1 DEVIATIONS, and the "T2 dev" column values are TANGENT 2 DEVIATIONS.<br><br>
 +
The tangent points are where the straights meet the bend arcs along the centerline.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width=300>
 
<td width=300>
[[image:VTL image 4 inch and 10 inch straights.png|500px]]<br><br>
+
[[image:VTL image 4 inch straights.png|500px]]<br><br>
  
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 100: Line 101:
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
==The Best Data for Qualification==
 
  
  
Line 106: Line 106:
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
The best data for qualification is centerline TANGENT POINT and MIDPOINT data in the Inspection Data menu and in the Reports menu. <br><br>
+
'''OUTSIDE THE ENVELOPES: DOES NOT QUALIFY'''<br><br>
[[image:vtube-laser-t1d-mp-t2d-image1.png|500px]]
+
This second alignment image shows the part with IDENTICAL ANGLES - but the two middle straights are <b>increased in length to 10 inches between bends.</b><br><br>
 +
The important point to notice is that both parts have the same diameters, the same rotations, and the same bend angles.  However, when increasing the lengths, the parts are in danger of rubbing themselves to failure (or colliding with some part of the application).  We only changed the lengths, and the part is now likely to fail if the envelope tolerances represent the maximum allowed space that the tube can use before it collides with something else.<br><br>
 +
See red cells in the Tangent point/Midpoint grid, and yellow tolerance envelopes where the pink (representing the measured aligned part) is breaking through the allowed tolerance.<br><br>
 +
The part is no longer within the tolerance allowed in 3D space - even though all the angle deviations are identical between the two parts.<br><br>
  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width=300>
 
<td width=300>
[[image:vtube-laser-tangent-report.png|500px]]
+
[[image:VTL image 4 inch and 10 inch straights.png|500px]]<br><br>
 +
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
== How to Understand the Tangent Data ==
+
== Example 2  ==
  
<table cellpadding=10>
+
<table cellpadding=10 width=900>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
<td width=500>
 
 
The image on the right shows the visual representation of the chart and report above.  The deviations in the grid match the part in the image.  The part is made transparent so that you can see the two centerlines inside the tube.  (It's easy to make parts transparent by setting the transparency value about 0.75 inside the Parametric Tube control menu under Models.)<br><br>
 
 
In the image below shows how the distance T1d is measured in the second straight:<br>
 
[[image:vtube-laser-t1d-illustrated.png|500px]]
 
 
<br>
 
In this case, the T1d value is 0.9mm for straight 2.
 
</td>
 
 
<td width=300>
 
<td width=300>
 
+
We show another smaller part with two tolerance envelope setups.<br><br>
</td>
+
Both parts are the identical shape. Look at the bender data deviations. They appear to be quite large according to the standards for companies that like to qualify with angles.  However, one part is acceptable, and the other part is not.  Depending on the envelope tolerance in the application, the same part may be acceptable.</td>
 +
<td width=600>
 +
[[image:qualifies5mm.png|600px]]<br><br>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
== How to Understand the End Point Deviations ==
+
==The Best Data for Qualification==
  
===Automatic Internal Trimming of End Points for Shape===
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
Even though the end points are not tangents, we can still use them in the chart because they qualify the part the same way that tangent points do.<br><br>
 
A key in understanding the T1d of straight one and the T2d of the last straight is to remember that the deviation is not the same as how long or short the straights are relative to the master tube shape.  See the illustration on the right to understand why.<br><br>
 
The MASTER to MEASURED end point deviation in the Tangent grid is 1.9mm.  The measurement is the distance between the two lines at the corresponding end points - as if the MEASURED WERE TRIMMED.<br><br>
 
(The Measured part is the pink part.  The Master part is white.)
 
</td>
 
<td width=300>
 
[[image:vtube-laser-t1d-end1.png|500px]]
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
  
===Untrimmed End Points for Lengths===
 
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
However, the end length is 90.2mm too long.<br><br>
+
The illustrations above show that the best data for tube shape qualification inside an envelope is centerline TANGENT POINT data in the Inspection Data menu and in the Reports menu.<br><br>
 
+
[[image:vtube-laser-t1d-mp-t2d-image1.png|500px]]<br><br>
In this application, the customer bent the part 90mm too long on purpose in order to give the bend arm clamp die enough material on the first straight to grip.<br><br>
+
For more information, see [[What are Centerline Tangent Points and Why Are They Important in VTube-LASER?]]
 
+
Notice that, even though the part is significantly too long, the BEST FIT algorithm didn't use the actual measured end point in the alignment.  The alignment was based on the trimmed point on the measured centerline that was nearest the master end point.<br><br>
+
 
+
So, in this case the part shape in space is qualified - but it needs trimming by 90.2mm to also qualify the end length (another critical qualifier).
+
  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width=300>
 
<td width=300>
[[image:vtube-laser-endlength.png|500px]]
+
[[image:vtube-laser-tangent-report.png|500px]]
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
 
+
=Typical Industry Tangent Point Envelope Tolerances=
=Typical Industry Tangent Point Tolerances=
+
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<table cellpadding=10>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<tr valign=top>
 
<td width=500>
 
<td width=500>
In working with  thousands of customers over the past few decades, we've seen some trends in accepted envelope deviation tolerances. Here are what we commonly see:
+
In working with  thousands of customers over the past few decades, we've seen some trends in accepted envelope deviation tolerances.<br><br>
 +
GD&T Profile Note: GD&T tube profile tolerances are always DOUBLE the VTube-LASER Envelope tolerances.  So, a GD&T profile tolerance of 0.120" is VTube-LASER's 0.060" envelope tolerance.  All tolerances that we show below are half the GD&T profile tolerances.
 +
 
 +
Here are what we commonly see:
  
 
====Aerospace and Automative Fluid Lines====
 
====Aerospace and Automative Fluid Lines====
Line 183: Line 162:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
Diameter Range
+
Diameter Range  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
Line 192: Line 171:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>
 
<td>
12.7 mm (0.5 inch) diameter tubes or less
+
12.7 mm (0.5 inch) diameter tubes or less  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
Line 201: Line 180:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>
 
<td>
Greater than 12.7 mm (0.5 inch)  
+
Greater than 12.7 mm (0.5 inch)
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
Line 214: Line 193:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
Diameter Range
+
Diameter Range  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
Line 226: Line 205:
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
From +/- 2 mm to +/- 3 mm
+
From +/- 2 mm to +/- 3 mm  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
Line 232: Line 211:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>
 
<td>
76 mm to 102 mm  
+
76 mm to 102 mm
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
Line 241: Line 220:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>
 
<td>
Larger then 102 mm
+
Larger then 102 mm  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
Line 249: Line 228:
  
 
</table>
 
</table>
 +
 +
 +
====Automotive Fluid Lines====
 +
<table cellpadding=10 width=400>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
 +
Length Range
 +
</td>
 +
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
 +
Envelope Tolerance
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
Up to 1000mm long after bending
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 +
From +/- 1 mm to +/- 2 mm
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>
 +
Over 1000mm long after bending
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 +
+/- 3 mm or greater
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
 +
</table>
 +
<br><br>
  
 
====Shipbuilding====
 
====Shipbuilding====
Line 254: Line 266:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
Diameter Range
+
Diameter Range  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
Line 277: Line 289:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
Diameter Range
+
Diameter Range  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
Line 299: Line 311:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
 
<td bgcolor=#9999CC>
Diameter Range
+
Diameter Range  
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
 
<td bgcolor=#CCCCFF width=200>
Line 319: Line 331:
 
====Tighter Tolerances====
 
====Tighter Tolerances====
  
Sometimes customers will required +/-0.75 mm - but this is very rare.  We've never seen tube shapes that must be qualified with a deviation tolerance of less than +/- 0.75 mm.
+
Sometimes customers will require +/-0.75 mm - but this is very rare.  We've never seen tube shapes that must be qualified with a deviation tolerance of less than +/- 0.75 mm.
  
 
</td>
 
</td>

Latest revision as of 19:58, 24 January 2020

Vtube-laser logo 1.96.png This page explains the major limitations of using bender data for qualifying tube shapes.

Vtl screen hd scanner without logo.png


Contents

What is Bender Data?

Bender data is the data used to setup tube bending machines. Usually, bender data has at three major columns of data - the LENGTH between bends, ROTATION planes between bends, and BEND ANGLE columns. These columns can be used to define the shape of a tube and setup a tube bender.

The three columns are referred to in many different ways by different bender manufacturers and software developers.

  • "LRA" or "LENGTH, ROTATION, ANGLE" = VTube and Supravision

  • "YBC" = Eaton Leonard Standard Axes, BendPro Controls

  • "PRB" = MiiC

  • "FRB" or FEED, ROTATE, BEND = CNC Bender ProControl for SMT

  • "XYZ" = Pedrazzoli, BLM

  • "FPB" = Chiyoda, KEINS, and COMCO

VTube-LASER Master LRA Data.png

CNCBenderFRBpage.jpg

ENVELOPES Qualifying Tube Shapes Are Much Better Than Bender Data Deviations Qualifying Tubes

The tube fabrication industry is rapidly abandoning the use of bender data deviations to qualify part shapes for a very good reason.

The problem with using bender data deviations for the qualification of a part shape is that it does not help you know if a part is inside or outside of 3D envelopes (or GD&T profiles) for each straight section in a tube shape without additional polar to linear calculations. Spatial envelopes represent the specific path in 3D space where the tube must be inside of in order to not cause a collision or rub itself to failure from vibration.

In VTube-LASER, this allowed space is called the ENVELOPE as defined by the TANGENT points along each straight in the defined tube (see the image on the right). (Tangent points are where the straights meet the bends.)

The ENVELOPE always includes a tolerance of deviation allowed. Think of the deviation as a spherical radius true position from the MASTER centerline.

Exhaust envelope tolerance.png
The above image is an example of an exhaust pipe with a blue band around the straight section. This blue band is the envelope tolerance.

Illustration of the Limitation

Look at the bender data on the right. The two sets are not the same because I've made the MEASURED rotations to be exactly one degree away from MASTER data rotations.

Try to answer this question: Given a tangent point envelope tolerance envelope of 0.100", does this part qualify or not?

This is the problem: There is no way to guess if this part is actually inside its allowed envelope in 3D space without performing some moderately complex trig calculations.

VTL compare master and measured LRA.png



Visually Demonstrate the Problem of Qualifying with Angles

So, unless you can perform 3D trigonometry on-the-fly, the answer to the question above isn't obvious. Even if we make a guess, we can't accurately guess at what tolerance envelope value the part would be considered acceptable.

It's easy to visually demonstrate the limitation of using bender data to tell us if a part shape falls within the tolerance envelope.

INSIDE THE ENVELOPES: QUALIFIES

Compare the two aligned parts on the image. The white tube is the MASTER. The pink tube is the MEASURED ALIGNED. The blue transparent cylinders that surround the tube are the TOLERANCE ENVELOPES. The tube shape must be within each straight's tolerance envelope to be considered a good shape - or a shape that qualifies.

This first part has 4 inch straights for every straight. (See the LRA data above.)

All the centerlines fall within within the tolerance envelope as defined by the Tangent Grid. The "T1 dev" column values are TANGENT 1 DEVIATIONS, and the "T2 dev" column values are TANGENT 2 DEVIATIONS.

The tangent points are where the straights meet the bend arcs along the centerline.

VTL image 4 inch straights.png


OUTSIDE THE ENVELOPES: DOES NOT QUALIFY

This second alignment image shows the part with IDENTICAL ANGLES - but the two middle straights are increased in length to 10 inches between bends.

The important point to notice is that both parts have the same diameters, the same rotations, and the same bend angles. However, when increasing the lengths, the parts are in danger of rubbing themselves to failure (or colliding with some part of the application). We only changed the lengths, and the part is now likely to fail if the envelope tolerances represent the maximum allowed space that the tube can use before it collides with something else.

See red cells in the Tangent point/Midpoint grid, and yellow tolerance envelopes where the pink (representing the measured aligned part) is breaking through the allowed tolerance.

The part is no longer within the tolerance allowed in 3D space - even though all the angle deviations are identical between the two parts.

VTL image 4 inch and 10 inch straights.png

Example 2

We show another smaller part with two tolerance envelope setups.

Both parts are the identical shape. Look at the bender data deviations. They appear to be quite large according to the standards for companies that like to qualify with angles. However, one part is acceptable, and the other part is not. Depending on the envelope tolerance in the application, the same part may be acceptable.

Qualifies5mm.png

The Best Data for Qualification

The illustrations above show that the best data for tube shape qualification inside an envelope is centerline TANGENT POINT data in the Inspection Data menu and in the Reports menu.

Vtube-laser-t1d-mp-t2d-image1.png

For more information, see What are Centerline Tangent Points and Why Are They Important in VTube-LASER?

Vtube-laser-tangent-report.png

Typical Industry Tangent Point Envelope Tolerances

In working with thousands of customers over the past few decades, we've seen some trends in accepted envelope deviation tolerances.

GD&T Profile Note: GD&T tube profile tolerances are always DOUBLE the VTube-LASER Envelope tolerances. So, a GD&T profile tolerance of 0.120" is VTube-LASER's 0.060" envelope tolerance. All tolerances that we show below are half the GD&T profile tolerances.

Here are what we commonly see:

Aerospace and Automative Fluid Lines

Diameter Range

Envelope Tolerance

12.7 mm (0.5 inch) diameter tubes or less

+/- 1 mm (0.039 inches)

Greater than 12.7 mm (0.5 inch)

+/- 2 mm (0.078 inches)

Automotive Exhaust Pipes

Diameter Range

Envelope Tolerance

50 mm to 76 mm

From +/- 2 mm to +/- 3 mm

76 mm to 102 mm

+/- 3 mm

Larger then 102 mm

+/- 3 mm or greater


Automotive Fluid Lines

Length Range

Envelope Tolerance

Up to 1000mm long after bending

From +/- 1 mm to +/- 2 mm

Over 1000mm long after bending

+/- 3 mm or greater



Shipbuilding

Diameter Range

Envelope Tolerance

All Diameters

+/- 6 mm


HVAC

Diameter Range

Envelope Tolerance

All Diameters

+/- 2 to +/- 3 mm

Structural Tubes (Frames)

Diameter Range

Envelope Tolerance

All Diameters

+/- 2 to +/- 3 mm

Tighter Tolerances

Sometimes customers will require +/-0.75 mm - but this is very rare. We've never seen tube shapes that must be qualified with a deviation tolerance of less than +/- 0.75 mm.

Aerospace envelope tolerance.png
Exhaust envelope tolerance.png
Shipbuilding envelope tolerance.png

Other Pages